Skip to main content

The Future of Tattoo Removal...?

Davis Zwicky
Dr. G 
Biol 1610
Blog Post

Today I came across an article that has a possible solution of removing tattoos in the near future as an alternative to laser removal. Laser tattoo removal is notorious for being very painful, time costly, and expensive. An article was posted in The Journal of Experimental Medicine explaining that a French research team has found a possible alternative involving blocking the immune system's macrophages, eventually leading the tattoo to be erased as the cells die off. 

I was very interested in this post because I have always been fascinated with tattoos and the stories behind the people that get them. I have seen plenty of amazing tattoos in my life and just as many, if not more, tattoos that people regret getting and no longer want on their body. When I talk to the people that do not like the tattoos on their body I ask them if they are thinking about getting them covered up or even removed. Almost everyone says that they are not willing to get them removed because the process is not worth the pain, money, or time to them. This new discovery presents a possible new alternative to laser removal which would not be painful. 

Sandrine Henri and her colleagues research the origins and genetics of skin macrophages and how they interact with other immune cells in the skin. When studying mice with black coats they discovered that they have a specific type of skin macrophage that ingest pigment particles, and it lead to the thought that macrophages in human skin may also play a roll on absorbing tattoo ink particles.

To prove that human skin macrophages held tattoo pigment they modified some mice to have macrophages with diphtheria toxin receptors. Once they tattooed the mice and confirmed that the ink was absorbed by the macrophages they exposed them to diphtheria to kill off the macrophages to see if the ink was destroyed along with them. Unexpectedly the ink stayed in the skin and they found out that once the macrophage is killed off the ink is released and just picked up by another one in a very close vicinity. This is how tattoos stay in our skin for so long with minimal spreading across your skin. 

So even though they did not come up with a complete method of completely removing tattoos they are in the process right now on developing a method for delivering genetic instructions to specified types of immune cells to not pick the ink up. This is just the beginning of this kind of research and I think will be figure out in the next several years! It would be an incredible discovery and a huge business if they can figure out how to remove tattoos with genetic instructions and simple killing of macrophages!

Works cited
Costandi, Mo. “Tats Off: Targeting the Immune System May Lead to Better Tattoo Removal.” Scientific American, 6 Mar. 2018, www.scientificamerican.com/article/tats-off-targeting-the-immune-system-may-lead-to-better-tattoo-removal/.

Comments

  1. UnknownApril 27, 2018 at 11:37 AM

    This is an interesting article. I too have always been fascinated by tattoos and the meaning behind receiving the tattoo. Do you think that once they do have a set method for this type of tattoo removal it will become a popular way of removing tattoos? I would imagine that it's quite expensive since there's so much science research and testing involved. So people might not go for it because it's so expensive. -MJA

    ReplyDelete
  2. UnknownApril 27, 2018 at 12:30 PM

    This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. UnknownApril 27, 2018 at 12:41 PM

    Davis, I find this topic extremely interesting because I never knew why it was so hard to remove a tattoo. My cousin got a tattoo in Europe when he was 18 years old and has regretted it ever since. The tattoo got infected and it does not look good. Now every time he goes to work, he has to wear an arm sleeve. He has always wanted to get it removed but has never had the money to do it. He is now 30 years old and this mess up has effected him his entire life. However, the fact that when they did the experiment on the mice, the macrophage was killed and then the ink would just attach to to another macrophage, makes me worry. If and when they are able to find a different treatment, it could end up just as costly as it is currently, but it could change what is now a painful removal, into a removal that is less painful. Even though the cost may still be high, at least it wouldn't hurt as bad. RR

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Kill The Pain But Not The Patient

               Opioid’s are a serious problem that according to Edward Bilsky, an opioid pharmacologist and provost at Pacific Northwest University of Health Sciences, can potentially be eliminated. Opioid addiction is a problem that needs to be faced as soon as possible. Utah has many different ads that are sure to be seen driving on the freeway, but we are not the only state that has an issue. Many people have died and many more will continue to die “In 2015, 2 million Americans suffered from prescription opioid addiction, and more than 33,000 died of an opioid overdose” (pg. 44) There is a solution to the problem at hand.               In Jonathon Keats’ article, building a better Painkiller, Christopher Stein stumbled upon something that would change the way that opioids are researched. He noticed that among rats an inflamed leg would be numb to the effects of touch, but anot...
22 comments
Read more

Sharks Cause Alzheimer's

                The article that I read and researched was about a study preformed on shark fins and shark meat. This study focuses on an effect that shark meat and fins have on humans that consume it. Scientists from the University of Miami found high concentrations of toxins linked to neurodegenerative diseases in the fins and muscles of 10 species of sharks (Biology News 2016). The scientist took samples from shark tissues in these 10 species from both the Atlantic and Pacific Ocean. After performing test on these samples they reported results of high concentration of “mercury and β-N-methylamino-L-alanine (BMAA). Recent studies have linked BMAA to neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's disease and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. While both mercury and BMAA by themselves pose a health risk, together they may also have synergistic toxic impacts.” (Biology News 2016).      ...
13 comments
Read more

Calories and Ageing

Alison Abbott in her article “Reduced-calorie diet shows signs of slowing ageing in people” (Abbott, A.) describes a part of a trial called the Comprehensive Assessment of Long term Effects of Reducing Intake of Energy (CALERIE). The 53 participants in the study were not obese, and they were split into a group that ate 15% less calories than normal, and a control group that ate a normal number of calories. The study lasted for two years. They measured the oxygen intake, carbon dioxide exhaled, and the nitrogen content of urine to come to their conclusions. The calorie restricting group could better use calories then the control group when they were asleep. Abbott talks about how mitochondria is important in the life span of things like worms and flies. We learned in our biology class that the mitochondria is an organelle in a cell that is responsible for the production of atp that provides the energy necessary to power the cell, and my guess is that lowering calorie intake will someho...
12 comments
Read more