Skip to main content

Babies Can Think Logically Before They Can Talk

    In this article, author Bret Stetka outlines research to show that babies do not need to speak to know basic reasoning. Stetka outlines information surrounding a group of European institutions that  conducted a study in which infants, ranging in age from 12-19 months were given items to inspect,  in particular a dinosaur. The researchers would conduct several different activities where the child would either be shown the toy, or an animation of it by hiding it behind a black wall. The animation included the researchers scouping up the dinosaur in a cup, or by including another toy with it. At first, the children couldn't really understand what was going on. But after a while, "The children deduced in these latter occurrences that something was not quite right, even though they were unable to articulate in words what was wrong." (Stetka 2018) Because, "Eye-tracking—a commonly used technique to gauge mental abilities in preverbal children and apes—showed infants stared significantly longer at scenes where the unexpected object appeared behind the barrier, suggesting they were confused by the reveal." (Stetka 2018) This simply means that infants carry an ability to understand things that are going on around them, even though they don't know how to say it. It shows that infants comprehension doesn't entirely depend on their knowledge of their native language, it shows us that children are a lot smarter and intelligent that we think they are. Cesans-Arlotti, one of the researchers, goes on to explain that during the examinations, the infants pupils became dialated when they saw something out of the ordinary happening with the toys. That it would cause a reaction out of the child. He goes on to add, "I think many people would say that most of their reasoning happens when they are silently talking to themselves in their heads. What this new study reveals is that preverbal infants are also working through this same type of serial reasoning, and doing so before robust language abilities have been mastered." (Stetka 2018) 

    One of the biggest questions I have always had when looking at an animal or an infant is, what are they thinking right now? What is going on in their head? This article stuck out because we often look at infants that are newborn or even 12 months and don't understand how much is going on inside of their minds. There is so much going on. This article provides evidence that even though they can't express it in words, that infants understand and have a capability to understand things gong on around them.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/babies-think-logically-before-they-can-talk/

Alex L.

Comments

  1. I agree that babies understand a lot more than we give them credit for! Having a 9-month old baby has opened up my eyes to how amazing babies are. She developed a distinct personality early on, and has very specific opinions about what she wants and doesn't want. Even though she can't express her thoughts and reasoning verbally, she gives me all types of non-verbal communication. So I really like this blogpost because it brings more awareness to how amazing babies are, and helps us have a better understanding of how they understand their world. - HQuinn

    ReplyDelete
  2. I found this really interesting to read! I used to work at a daycare, and I totally agree with this concept. I worked with ages 0-11, and babies are so curious about everything around them. Even if they don't have words to put to it.They interact differently with objects they like or dislike. Or even a food they don't particularly love. It is weird to think about though, because the general population does not picture babies as having opinions or thoughts about life, but they do. -A.R.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree , my sister had her baby a few months ago and babies really do have a sense of going on . I see her following everyones action , copying what they do. She is always interacting , I always used to say to my sister she is very well aware of what is happening. Babies are truly amazing
    -L Rebolledo

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Kill The Pain But Not The Patient

               Opioid’s are a serious problem that according to Edward Bilsky, an opioid pharmacologist and provost at Pacific Northwest University of Health Sciences, can potentially be eliminated. Opioid addiction is a problem that needs to be faced as soon as possible. Utah has many different ads that are sure to be seen driving on the freeway, but we are not the only state that has an issue. Many people have died and many more will continue to die “In 2015, 2 million Americans suffered from prescription opioid addiction, and more than 33,000 died of an opioid overdose” (pg. 44) There is a solution to the problem at hand.               In Jonathon Keats’ article, building a better Painkiller, Christopher Stein stumbled upon something that would change the way that opioids are researched. He noticed that among rats an inflamed leg would be numb to the effects of touch, but anot...

Sharks Cause Alzheimer's

                The article that I read and researched was about a study preformed on shark fins and shark meat. This study focuses on an effect that shark meat and fins have on humans that consume it. Scientists from the University of Miami found high concentrations of toxins linked to neurodegenerative diseases in the fins and muscles of 10 species of sharks (Biology News 2016). The scientist took samples from shark tissues in these 10 species from both the Atlantic and Pacific Ocean. After performing test on these samples they reported results of high concentration of “mercury and β-N-methylamino-L-alanine (BMAA). Recent studies have linked BMAA to neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's disease and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. While both mercury and BMAA by themselves pose a health risk, together they may also have synergistic toxic impacts.” (Biology News 2016).      ...

Calories and Ageing

Alison Abbott in her article “Reduced-calorie diet shows signs of slowing ageing in people” (Abbott, A.) describes a part of a trial called the Comprehensive Assessment of Long term Effects of Reducing Intake of Energy (CALERIE). The 53 participants in the study were not obese, and they were split into a group that ate 15% less calories than normal, and a control group that ate a normal number of calories. The study lasted for two years. They measured the oxygen intake, carbon dioxide exhaled, and the nitrogen content of urine to come to their conclusions. The calorie restricting group could better use calories then the control group when they were asleep. Abbott talks about how mitochondria is important in the life span of things like worms and flies. We learned in our biology class that the mitochondria is an organelle in a cell that is responsible for the production of atp that provides the energy necessary to power the cell, and my guess is that lowering calorie intake will someho...