Hayden Garfield
Blog Post
In1995 the National Park and U.S. Fish and Wildlife services reintroduced 14
wolves back into Yellowstone National Park. In 1996, 17 more wolves were
brought into the park and released. This was the first time that wolves (Canis lupus) had roamed Yellowstone since the early 1900s. Due to people’s views
of wolves as pests, they had been hunted and trapped to extinction in the
Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem. In this blog post I wish to discuss the
importance of the reintroduction of wolves and how it has influenced the
ecology in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem.
Shortly after wolves were exterminated from Yellowstone in the early 1900s, the elk
population in Yellowstone began to increase exponentially. Numbers rose rapidly
until the population had risen to over 20,000 elk on the northern range. This
obviously had its effects on the rest of the environment. With that many elk,
grazing resources needed to be provided. The elk began to eat willow and aspen
saplings thus stunting the growth of the willow and aspen population. Without
the reproduction of these trees and bushes they began to disappear from the
park. With them, many animals began to disappear as well such as beavers in the
1950s, and variety of birds that relied on willows and aspen trees for their
livelihood. Evidence of this was provided by William J. Ripple, a professor of
botany at Oregon State University. When looking at old photographs of the park
he noticed the abundance of willow and aspen trees and compared that with what
he saw in the park in the 1990s. He sampled 98 aspen trees and found that only
two of these trees had begun their growth after the 1920s, right around the
same time the wolves were exterminated. He also observed that these two trees
were in locations that elk had previously been hesitant to go in fear of being
killed by wolves. He concluded that the absence of wolves was in fact a major
factor in the decline of willow and aspen trees. As stated above, this decline
is far reaching and is having a major effect not only on plant life, but also
on the other animal life in the park.
When wolves were reintroduced into the park in 1995 and 1996, the elk numbers
dropped dramatically. In less than a decade, the numbers had dropped by half,
leaving about 10,000 elk in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem thus stabilizing
the number of elk in the northern herd. This drop in the number of elk has
obviously had its effect on the ecosystem. But it is not only the drop in the
number of elk, but also the change in the behavior of the elk that is being
observed that has made a noticeable difference in the Park. With the threat of
wolves again present in Yellowstone, elk have changed their feeding patterns.
Instead of feeding down in the river bottoms where many willow and aspen
saplings attempt to grow, the elk have begun to feed in locations where they
have great visibility and can see if a predator is approaching. This has
allowed for these saplings to take root and grow to a height where they can
survive and reproduce instead of being eaten by elk in their early stages of
life. With the return of a willow population the first beaver dams in over 50
years are being observed in the Lamar Valley in Yellowstone. With the return of
the beaver comes dams which can slow the flow of water thus reducing erosion to
the banks of the Lamar River and Slough Creek. With this slower running water
also comes better habitat for the trout, otters, and other waterfowl
population.
Other changes that have occurred since the reintroduction of wolves has included the
number of coyotes in the ecosystem. Coyote numbers have dropped by more than
50% because of the reintroduction of wolves. At first this seems like a
negative, but when one takes a closer look at it, it is evident that this is in
fact a positive. With a decrease in coyotes there is an increase in their prey
such as voles, rabbits, foxes, etc. many of which were struggling in the
absence of wolves. Wolves are also masterful at hunting elk and will, at times,
take down multiple elk a week. When they have received their fill of the meat,
they leave the remaining food to be scavenged on by bears, coyotes, foxes, and
many species of birds.
It is clear that wolves have had a significant impact on the Greater Yellowstone
Ecosystem in helping to balance out the environment. Of course, there are those
who still do not believe that wolves do not have a positive impact on the
environment or that they have made too much of a difference, but for me there
is so much scientific evidence that can back up the positive influence of
wolves on a healthy ecosystem. It is also important that we as a society
understand that we should not remove parts of the ecosystem that are meant to
be there because it will throw off the balance of the ecosystem. We need to be
aware of our surroundings and that everything has its own function.
The reason that I chose to post on this topic was because I absolutely love
Yellowstone and the wildlife that lives there. I have gone there every year
since I was a very young child with my family. Although wolves were introduced
the same year that I was born I have been able to observe many of the effects
that wolves have had on the ecosystem that I discussed in this paper such as
the decrease in the number of elk and the increase in willow and aspen tree
growth. My father is a science teacher and has taught me about many of the
topics discussed in this post as well from the time I was young. I feel like I
have a vested interest on this topic because of the amount of time I have spent
in Yellowstone and on the subject of Yellowstone, especially the wildlife
there.
I love how this post brings to light the need we have for wolves and predators in general for proper game management. One individual species is incredibly important to the whole surrounding ecosystem, and Yellowstone has suffered greatly from the lack of wolves. In general, people need to leave their fear of wolves behind as they need to do so with firearms. Just because something looks scary does not mean it is evil, and yet this has haunted the wolf wherever it roams. It's ridiculous that there is a political war occurring right now to not recognize a wolf population in Utah, and this irrational fear is damaging our forests. I think this post understated the importance of coyote populations being brought down. Coyotes breed like wildfire and eliminate so much small game that it's necessary for their numbers to be cut by a big predator, and this too often translates to us because we have eliminated all other predators to do it. Hope to see this leech over from Yellowstone into Utah too. - JP
ReplyDeleteMy questions is, looking at the problems the wolfs have caused since, should we get rid of them again? The wolfs we introduce are much larger, and much more dangerous creatures, then the previous ones there. Instead of having the threat of the wolfs, we could take over like the top alpha predators we are. Malachi Ruf
ReplyDeleteInteresting question. I mostly grew up in Montana, and I knew quite a few ranchers who complained bitterly about the reintroduction of wolves, and made similar points to what you have, stating they could easily kill just as many elk in a year as a wolf, and not loose any sheep in the process. I am not sure if there is any hard evidence that it was wolves straying from Yellowstone that were killing the sheep, as I recall the park rangers claimed that the killings were actually done by coyotes, which it was argued that only were there in such large numbers because they were being displaced by the new wolves. I don't think that the wolves have actually caused as many problems as is thought, now that their numbers have better stabilized. It did take a while for that to happen, but when you review the wolf numbers published by the NPS, it does appear that they have indeed stabilized. as mentioned in this article, https://phys.org/news/2013-02-wolves-impact-yellowstone-ecosystems.html it took multiple other factors to change to actually benefit the environment. As those other factors are changing, the environment is doing better and becoming more stable each year. PS
Delete