Skip to main content

Yellowstone Wolf Reintroduction

Hayden Garfield

Blog Post

            In1995 the National Park and U.S. Fish and Wildlife services reintroduced 14 wolves back into Yellowstone National Park. In 1996, 17 more wolves were brought into the park and released. This was the first time that wolves (Canis lupus) had roamed Yellowstone since the early 1900s. Due to people’s views of wolves as pests, they had been hunted and trapped to extinction in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem. In this blog post I wish to discuss the importance of the reintroduction of wolves and how it has influenced the ecology in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem.
            Shortly after wolves were exterminated from Yellowstone in the early 1900s, the elk population in Yellowstone began to increase exponentially. Numbers rose rapidly until the population had risen to over 20,000 elk on the northern range. This obviously had its effects on the rest of the environment. With that many elk, grazing resources needed to be provided. The elk began to eat willow and aspen saplings thus stunting the growth of the willow and aspen population. Without the reproduction of these trees and bushes they began to disappear from the park. With them, many animals began to disappear as well such as beavers in the 1950s, and variety of birds that relied on willows and aspen trees for their livelihood. Evidence of this was provided by William J. Ripple, a professor of botany at Oregon State University. When looking at old photographs of the park he noticed the abundance of willow and aspen trees and compared that with what he saw in the park in the 1990s. He sampled 98 aspen trees and found that only two of these trees had begun their growth after the 1920s, right around the same time the wolves were exterminated. He also observed that these two trees were in locations that elk had previously been hesitant to go in fear of being killed by wolves. He concluded that the absence of wolves was in fact a major factor in the decline of willow and aspen trees. As stated above, this decline is far reaching and is having a major effect not only on plant life, but also on the other animal life in the park.
            When wolves were reintroduced into the park in 1995 and 1996, the elk numbers dropped dramatically. In less than a decade, the numbers had dropped by half, leaving about 10,000 elk in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem thus stabilizing the number of elk in the northern herd. This drop in the number of elk has obviously had its effect on the ecosystem. But it is not only the drop in the number of elk, but also the change in the behavior of the elk that is being observed that has made a noticeable difference in the Park. With the threat of wolves again present in Yellowstone, elk have changed their feeding patterns. Instead of feeding down in the river bottoms where many willow and aspen saplings attempt to grow, the elk have begun to feed in locations where they have great visibility and can see if a predator is approaching. This has allowed for these saplings to take root and grow to a height where they can survive and reproduce instead of being eaten by elk in their early stages of life. With the return of a willow population the first beaver dams in over 50 years are being observed in the Lamar Valley in Yellowstone. With the return of the beaver comes dams which can slow the flow of water thus reducing erosion to the banks of the Lamar River and Slough Creek. With this slower running water also comes better habitat for the trout, otters, and other waterfowl population.
            Other changes that have occurred since the reintroduction of wolves has included the number of coyotes in the ecosystem. Coyote numbers have dropped by more than 50% because of the reintroduction of wolves. At first this seems like a negative, but when one takes a closer look at it, it is evident that this is in fact a positive. With a decrease in coyotes there is an increase in their prey such as voles, rabbits, foxes, etc. many of which were struggling in the absence of wolves. Wolves are also masterful at hunting elk and will, at times, take down multiple elk a week. When they have received their fill of the meat, they leave the remaining food to be scavenged on by bears, coyotes, foxes, and many species of birds.
            It is clear that wolves have had a significant impact on the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem in helping to balance out the environment. Of course, there are those who still do not believe that wolves do not have a positive impact on the environment or that they have made too much of a difference, but for me there is so much scientific evidence that can back up the positive influence of wolves on a healthy ecosystem. It is also important that we as a society understand that we should not remove parts of the ecosystem that are meant to be there because it will throw off the balance of the ecosystem. We need to be aware of our surroundings and that everything has its own function.

The reason that I chose to post on this topic was because I absolutely love Yellowstone and the wildlife that lives there. I have gone there every year since I was a very young child with my family. Although wolves were introduced the same year that I was born I have been able to observe many of the effects that wolves have had on the ecosystem that I discussed in this paper such as the decrease in the number of elk and the increase in willow and aspen tree growth. My father is a science teacher and has taught me about many of the topics discussed in this post as well from the time I was young. I feel like I have a vested interest on this topic because of the amount of time I have spent in Yellowstone and on the subject of Yellowstone, especially the wildlife there.  






Comments

  1. I love how this post brings to light the need we have for wolves and predators in general for proper game management. One individual species is incredibly important to the whole surrounding ecosystem, and Yellowstone has suffered greatly from the lack of wolves. In general, people need to leave their fear of wolves behind as they need to do so with firearms. Just because something looks scary does not mean it is evil, and yet this has haunted the wolf wherever it roams. It's ridiculous that there is a political war occurring right now to not recognize a wolf population in Utah, and this irrational fear is damaging our forests. I think this post understated the importance of coyote populations being brought down. Coyotes breed like wildfire and eliminate so much small game that it's necessary for their numbers to be cut by a big predator, and this too often translates to us because we have eliminated all other predators to do it. Hope to see this leech over from Yellowstone into Utah too. - JP

    ReplyDelete
  2. My questions is, looking at the problems the wolfs have caused since, should we get rid of them again? The wolfs we introduce are much larger, and much more dangerous creatures, then the previous ones there. Instead of having the threat of the wolfs, we could take over like the top alpha predators we are. Malachi Ruf

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Interesting question. I mostly grew up in Montana, and I knew quite a few ranchers who complained bitterly about the reintroduction of wolves, and made similar points to what you have, stating they could easily kill just as many elk in a year as a wolf, and not loose any sheep in the process. I am not sure if there is any hard evidence that it was wolves straying from Yellowstone that were killing the sheep, as I recall the park rangers claimed that the killings were actually done by coyotes, which it was argued that only were there in such large numbers because they were being displaced by the new wolves. I don't think that the wolves have actually caused as many problems as is thought, now that their numbers have better stabilized. It did take a while for that to happen, but when you review the wolf numbers published by the NPS, it does appear that they have indeed stabilized. as mentioned in this article, https://phys.org/news/2013-02-wolves-impact-yellowstone-ecosystems.html it took multiple other factors to change to actually benefit the environment. As those other factors are changing, the environment is doing better and becoming more stable each year. PS

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Orcas (and Friends) can Imitate Human Speech

Savannah Peterson 2/5/2018 A recent study involving a young orca named Wikie has concluded that orcas can imitate human speech. This study came about to explore the complex societies that are orca pods. It has been shown in the past that orca pods are capable of intraspecies communication at a level that even includes different dialects. This raises questions like, if the communication is complex enough to be distinguishable from pod to pod, what is the level of complex thought behind it? And if there is a rudimentary language of sorts, do orcas also possess culture? The fact that families of orcas communicate in ways unique to their upbringing suggests some sort of "vocal tradition" as the article puts it.  Wikie was tasked with explaining this behavior by copying sounds of her trainer and sounds played for her like a creaky door and laughter for a reward of fish. Her ability to quickly mimic the sounds in a few tries was impressive and enlightening for the scientist...

Household chemicals rival vehicles as smog source- Sarah Quist

Household chemicals rival vehicles as smog source Sarah Quist BIOL 1610 2/17/18 This article was of particular interest to me as I have been keenly aware, for many years now, the dangers of toxic household products, personal products and chemicals used on lawns and gardens. Although regulations have made some progress in reducing vehicle emissions, smog remains a huge problem in US cities. A group of researchers set out to find what other sources could be contributing to the continuation of polluted air. The research was led by Brian McDonald, an air-pollution researcher at the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) in Bolder, Colorado. Brian stated that he was surprised to find that the products he used in the morning to get ready for work are comparable to the emissions coming from the tailpipe of his car. What they found was that chemical products are different than vehicle emissions in that they are designed to evaporate. "Once in the air, the compoun...

Getting the Inside Dope on Ketamine’s Mysterious Ability to Rapidly Relieve Depression

In the article Getting the Inside Dope on Ketamine’s Mysterious Ability to Rapidly Relieve Depression by Simon Makin, he opens with, “Ketamine has been called the biggest thing to happen to psychiatry in 50 years…” The article discusses how researches don’t yet completely understand how the drug Ketamine can improve depression symptoms in as little as 30 minutes, but other known anti-depressants take weeks or even months. The article goes on about how ketamine early on started being abused like most drugs and it is known to cause hallucinations, out-of-body experiences and other effects and its anti-depressant properties weren’t discovered until about 20 years later. Researchers have found that ketamine does not influence mood like other ant-depressants, but it actually affects the brain by blocking depression from entering the lateral habenula (LHb). LHb is what activates when your expectations are not met or you are disappointed. Tests were ran on lab rats that showed depre...